Acer Swift SF315-52G

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer Swift SF315-52G (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Erdinger_KL
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181221
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '21 at 04:13
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 219 70% 129 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 323 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1273) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 7.4 5% 10.6 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 0.2 4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 88 68 65 62 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 299 Write 126 Mixed 133 SusWrite 75.5 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 8.5 66% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 119 118% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 133GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 73 72 70 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 85.8 Write 55.9 Mixed 30 SusWrite 73.2 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.2 129% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8JT Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.7% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 21.4 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 21.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Swift SF315-52G Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF315-52G

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	117x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	28x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	115x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	30x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	26x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	22x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	16x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	22x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	19x
ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 1,016 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16