HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 174% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 185% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8703
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10850K-$286 84,873 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 156 2-Core 295 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 562 8-Core 1,024 95% 793 Pts	64-Core 1,856 115% 1,856 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% HP(103C 88B7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	181% Outstanding	Lighting 257 Reflection 260 Parallax 292 209% 270 fps	MRender 298 Gravity 232 Splatting 175 186% 235 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 230%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 698GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 811 829 828 814 831 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,321 Write 1,612 Mixed 1,207 SusWrite 922 285% 1,265 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 44.5 153% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,097 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 230 265% 485 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 268%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 2x16GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 26.8 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 24.5 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,571x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	1,299x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	746x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,695x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	803x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	571x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	919x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 191%, 10,094 samples	803x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	553x

RAM
HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 1,949 samples	843x
HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 84%, 3,401 samples	600x
HP32D4U8D8HC-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 98%, 1,304 samples	497x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $261	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16