Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '21 at 13:02
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 81.5 1-Core 132 2-Core 304 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 936 91% 745 Pts	64-Core 1,449 90% 1,449 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.2% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 35.7 28% 36.1 fps	MRender 35.5 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 24.9 26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 20,095 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 238 266 275 271 274 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 2245 Write 1,112 Mixed 124 SusWrite 291 205% 943 MB/s	4K Read 54.4 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 77.3 219% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 822 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 297 272% 436 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 184 205 210 205 214 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 160 164 162 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 142 Write 169 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 150 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWX16GC3200C16W4 2x16GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.9% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 20.4 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 22.2 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	253x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,388

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16