Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 95.5 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 164 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 507 49% 401 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 116 Parallax 106 87% 110 fps	MRender 96.4 Gravity 107 Splatting 102 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 475 Write 346 Mixed 312 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 34.7 123% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 99.1 104% 171 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 145 145 145 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 154 Write 154 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 142 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 124GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 109 111 109 110 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 65.8 Write 66.5 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 108 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 67%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 365GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 87.5 Write 91.3 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 80.2 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 54%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 50GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 31.8 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 3.5 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 74%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 722GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 28 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 32.2 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 28 41% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 21.4 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 14.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16