Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '21 at 02:10
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 272 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 869 80% 670 Pts	64-Core 1122 69% 1122 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3752) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 111 Parallax 127 101% 121 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 106 Splatting 97 91% 114 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 294 307 307 309 308 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 162 Mixed 246 SusWrite 305 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 28.7 155% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 237 208% 311 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 217GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 92 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 100 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 97.3 65% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 3,571 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 23.7 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 27.6 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,616x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,216x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	218x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	361x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16