PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3062-A1 |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150618 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '21 at 22:43 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
|
3.4%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 35 49 44 37 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
119GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 80 80 81 MB/s
|
49%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 84x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 66x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 22x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $281 |