Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 24.1 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 96.4 30% 56.4 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 186 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 3 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 6 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8L 256GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHFL03C SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 258 254 238 263 267 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.5% Above average	Read 272 Write 246 Mixed 237 SusWrite 254 57% 252 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 15.6 49% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 197 166% 242 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4F6E304HB-MGCJ 4x2GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 10.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 292 14% 292 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	56x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	32x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	45x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	20x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	12x

SSD
SSDSCKKF128G8L 128GBIntelBench 55%, 138 samples	24x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	18x
RTITF128PCA1MADL 128GBBench 52%, 89 samples	10x

RAM
MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 4x1GBMicronBench 20%, 428 samples	34x
H9HCNNN8KUMLHR 4x1GBHynixBench 18%, 593 samples	25x
K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GBSamsungBench 19%, 1,067 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16