HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 805A
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201020
Uptime	54.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '21 at 16:35
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 953 User benchmarks, average bench 43% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 124 51% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 188 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 38.1 30% 38.5 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 27.5 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 379 383 344 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 447 Write 396 Mixed 367 SusWrite 266 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 34.3 122% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 97.8 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 127 103% 143 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 96%
Toshiba HDWD220 2TB 3,711 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: KP000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 177 177 178 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 182 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 174 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.6 269% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 2x8GB 1,544 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.9% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 14.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

CPU
PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 953 samples	103x
PRO A10-8750B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 44%, 537 samples	46x
PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4GAMDBench 35%, 207 samples	18x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	70x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	41x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 4,872 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 1,599 samples	4x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	6x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 9,029 samples	5x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 55%, 109 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16