| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Emachines EL1850 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | eMachines EL1850 |
| Memory | 0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1176 x 664 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100114 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 16 '21 at 16:02 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
31.1%
Below average
|
30% 42.2 Pts
|
6% 44.5 Pts
|
4% 66.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
21% 45.7 fps
|
31% 37.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 64 111 87 100 125 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
32% 144 MB/s
|
67% 20.6 MB/s
|
38% 53.5 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
141GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 108 89 102 124 MB/s
|
76.9%
Very good
|
78% 109 MB/s
|
139% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
3% 0.97 GB/s
|
28% 141 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EL1850 Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Emachines EL1850
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 4x |
| Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples | 7x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $129 |