PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190322 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '21 at 03:41 |
Run Duration | 339 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
104%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 338 230 241 248 240 MB/s
|
93.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub WH 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.8 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub WH 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.8 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.4 MB/s
|
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
6TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
Apple iPod 160GB
114GB free, PID 1261
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 35 35 37 36 37 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 4.2 4.5 4.4 4.5 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
5.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 71 73 74 72 74 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.5 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 12TB
6TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 71 73 74 72 74 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 5 4.8 4.7 6 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
469GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.8 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 12TB
9.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 71 73 73 72 73 MB/s
|
63%
Good
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 14TB
3.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 70 72 74 72 73 MB/s
|
54.9%
Above average
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 264D 14TB
13TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 70 72 73 71 73 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
23GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.6 4.1 3.9 3.2 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
9.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 71 73 73 71 74 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 1,080x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 887x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 572x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 291x |
RTX 2080Nvidia $396Bench 124%, 316,424 samples | 232x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 228x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 110% - Outstanding | Total price: $687 |