Monster ABRA A5 V9.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V9.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V9.3
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171103
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 03:22
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 306
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 38.8
32% 36.9 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 27.8
28% 35.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6.5
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$69
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 48 45 86 43 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 414
Write 218
Mixed 115
SusWrite 58.3
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 15.7
57% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 33.5
53% 105 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 68%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
90GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 61 60 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 89.7
Write 96.4
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 61.6
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 9905700-011.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 23.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V9.3 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V9.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $69
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback