Asus Z170-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics256% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$310
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 221
86% 146 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 613
62% 493 Pts
64-Core 610
41% 610 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,500
EVGA(3842 3987) ≥ 4GB; evga
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Lighting 343
Reflection 311
Parallax 390
277% 348 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 270
Splatting 194
231% 281 fps
Poor: 191%
This bench: 256%
Great: 256%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$124
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1772 1776 1724 1688 1644 1537 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,331
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,212
SusWrite 1,690
389% 1,739 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 81.8
294% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 891
DQ Mixed 973
738% 998 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 332%
Great: 395%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$140
355GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1781 1653 1662 1647 1664 1534 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,232
Write 2,109
Mixed 1,442
SusWrite 1,657
418% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 97.3
333% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,298
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 1160
877% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 347%
Great: 357%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
45GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 451 459 462 466 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 421
Mixed 368
SusWrite 458
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 48.1
167% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$250
2TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 462 460 463 461 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 423
Mixed 408
SusWrite 462
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 61.8
206% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 335
256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 139%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$250
2TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 462 460 463 461 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 424
Mixed 419
SusWrite 462
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.2
208% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 338
256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 32.3
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 29.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z170-DELUXE - $319

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback