Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200707
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '21 at 09:32
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 89.8 1-Core 138 2-Core 276 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 729 81% 639 Pts	64-Core 781 48% 781 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 72.7 Reflection 109 Parallax 68.3 59% 83.4 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 71 Splatting 67.4 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 7,214 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,719 Write 1,180 Mixed 780 270% 1,226 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 62.9 216% 76.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,285 DQ Write 908 DQ Mixed 970 758% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 243%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 35GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 93 94 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 282 Write 120 Mixed 173 SusWrite 91.8 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 31 117% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 82.6 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 104 78% 102 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 73%
Samsung MZ7LM480HCHP-0E003 480GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 91GB free Firmware: GXT3003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 372 377 379 381 379 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 407 Mixed 322 SusWrite 374 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 37.6 132% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 290 235% 333 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 113%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 73GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 69 69 70 71 71 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 71.9 Write 69.8 Mixed 52 SusWrite 68.5 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 170 171 177 178 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 163 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 173 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 108%
Medianca External USB 3.0 1TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 133GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 92.7 Write 101 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 74.1 55% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 57%
ASMedia USB 3.0 Device 2TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 178GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 186 186 189 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 151 Write 142 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 187 169% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 77%
ASMedia ASM1153 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 340GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 156 155 155 156 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 141 Write 116 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 154 142% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 71%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 128GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 122 122 123 121 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 147 Write 123 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 121 155% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.3 166% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 112GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 123 113 115 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 133 Write 132 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 118 130% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GISB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 28.5 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 24.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $130

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	402x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	361x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	359x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	180x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	111x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	61x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	125x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	100x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $710

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16