Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '21 at 04:27
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 57.8 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 210 66% 122 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 361 48% 362 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217 72,993 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 04E6) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 71.5 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 96.9 58% 78.2 fps	MRender 53.9 Gravity 76.1 Splatting 43.9 46% 58 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 115 96 107 59 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 377 Write 331 Mixed 278 SusWrite 104 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 12 49% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 94.7 DQ Mixed 17.8 37% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 186GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 108 113 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 126 Write 124 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 107 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB 3,279 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	544x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	223x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	115x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	57x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	96x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16