Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120410
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.8% Average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 79.1 49% 73.6 Pts	4-Core 84.8 8-Core 86.1 11% 85.4 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.2% Very good	Lighting 112 Reflection 54.3 Parallax 73.8 91% 80 fps	MRender 59.8 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 80.7 56% 66.1 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 216 Write 215 Mixed 190 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 21.2 66% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 183 136% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 11GB free Firmware: 0309 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 65 82 58 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 356 Write 183 Mixed 207 SusWrite 73.9 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 13.9 63% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 56.3 61% 103 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 72%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 94GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 81 80 79 80 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 70.4 Write 51.8 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 75.4 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 3.1 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	542x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	385x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16