Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 35.8 1-Core 53.7 2-Core 94.6 35% 61.4 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 139 25% 173 Pts	64-Core 94.3 6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5086) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 1.4 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0106AELA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 475 Write 333 Mixed 420 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 48.9 163% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 542 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 223 206% 326 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.6% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	2x

SSD
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 3,234 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16