Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100504
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 12:52
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 100
53% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 296
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 40.9
27% 36.1 fps
MRender 47.2
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 34.7
32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 493
Write 363
Mixed 390
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 35.2
117% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 87.5
93% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
454GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 106
Write 99.5
Mixed 64.9
67% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
70GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 123
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.15
66% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71.9
Write 68.3
Mixed 63
51% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.35
98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 51%
WD WD7500AALX-009BA0 750GB
1GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 58.1
Write 55.4
Mixed 60.5
44% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.43
106% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
497GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 27.1
Mixed 24.8
34% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.21
60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback