Asus X55C

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus X55C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X55C
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 135 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 190 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 1.6 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 175 64 64 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 442 Write 351 Mixed 337 SusWrite 114 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 22 77% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 103 102% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 865GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 104 107 110 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 110 Write 66 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 105 61% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 59%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 14GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 4.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 5 7% 4.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 58% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1MS 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X55C Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X55C

CPU
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	64x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	18x
Pentium B980IntelBench 46%, 3,640 samples	9x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	64x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	41x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBElpidaBench 43%, 67 samples	3x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBElpidaBench 43%, 107 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16