Medion MS-7797

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion MS-7797 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7797
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121213
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '21 at 00:21
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 198 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 505 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 145 Parallax 138 110% 139 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 136 Splatting 124 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 102 121 98 125 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 478 Write 121 Mixed 390 SusWrite 117 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 19.8 83% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 36.4 79% 159 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 99%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$279 10,028 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3.5TB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 241 239 241 242 242 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.9% Good	Read 254 Write 148 Mixed 195 SusWrite 240 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 33.3 106% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 139 120% 177 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 115GB free Firmware: CC4G SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 154 152 155 127 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 145 Write 112 Mixed 73 SusWrite 143 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1600D364L11/8G 16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17.1 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7797 Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7797

CPU
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	157x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	136x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	148x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,719 samples	64x
M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 2x2GBNanyaBench 48%, 472 samples	33x
M378B5773EB0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 52%, 217 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16