HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '21 at 00:11
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 510 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 59.3 Parallax 53.7 44% 55.7 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 48 44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 158 224 210 100 241 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 480 Write 414 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 221 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 1.2 39% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 14.5 DQ Mixed 44.1 46% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 285GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 142 140 140 141 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 147 Write 139 Mixed 80 SusWrite 140 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 711GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 129 130 129 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 129 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 75%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 4TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3TB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 23.4 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 29.2 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 188% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 91%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1.5TB 770 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 590GB free, PID 5071 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 38.1 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 39 45% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GLLTU160N02 4x8GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	964x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	399x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	379x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	335x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16