To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 64
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 116
48% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 518
43% 375 Pts
64-Core 1,397
86% 1,397 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 74
44% 61 fps
MRender 55
Gravity 57.1
Splatting 41
41% 51 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M Series NVMe SSD 128G 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 85 109 118 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 1,121
Write 52
Mixed 282
SusWrite 98.9
83% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 13.1
98% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 83.1
102% 189 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 179%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
228GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 72.1
Write 67.3
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 73.6
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 57 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 59.4
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 57.6
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 35.5
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback