Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 140
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 436
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 453
30% 453 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 27.4
19% 29.5 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 24.3
19% 27.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$50
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 152 155 151 148 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66% Good
Read 338
Write 299
Mixed 249
SusWrite 150
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 32.8
106% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 169
142% 207 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66%
Great: 115%
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
174GB free
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 170 169 172 174 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 328
Write 296
Mixed 286
SusWrite 169
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 34.9
118% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 226
172% 232 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 121%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB
227GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 31.2
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 36.4
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 F3-14900CL8-4GBXM F3-14900CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 5,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback