Today's hottest deals

HP 1000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 1000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 19:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 123
54% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 92
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1025F8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 503
Write 473
Mixed 500
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 23.4
101% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 20.2
27% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82%
Great: 114%
Generic External 500GB
123GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 26.7
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.19
55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 1000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback