Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 05:19
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 328
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,120
107% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 142
Parallax 143
113% 141 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
117% 143 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 112%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 19 16 16 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 275
Write 36.7
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 19.4
19% 90 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 12.5
70% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 23.5
32% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 78%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
20GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,747
Write 1,763
Mixed 1,238
353% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 95.8
343% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 606
543% 816 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
101GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 118 118 124 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 143
Write 119
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 125
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105
192GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 92 91 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 95.4
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 92.7
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4WL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 34.9
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 32.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback