Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FA706IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA706IU
Memory	18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201217
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 20,504 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 229 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 620 62% 502 Pts	64-Core 843 52% 843 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 16FF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 86 Parallax 18.7 11% 39.3 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 13.8 Splatting 16.7 12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 17%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 16FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.9% Good	Lighting 80.2 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 79.7 65% 82.7 fps	MRender 93.9 Gravity 75.6 Splatting 69.7 64% 79.7 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 147 65 89 44 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 663 Write 164 Mixed 277 SusWrite 90 65% 299 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 28.9 100% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 381 249% 293 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 185%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 46GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 179 174 157 150 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 382 Mixed 354 SusWrite 185 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 46.4 160% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 277 208% 278 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 469GB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 33 31 36 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 28.5 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 33.6 23% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 137% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD4AGS88C-32N2200 2x16GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 29 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	132x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	102x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	82x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	53x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	29x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	45x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	31x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	26x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16