Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	52GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 52GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 204 63% 114 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 568 61% 485 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 8338) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.93 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.2% Poor	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 32.8 27% 33.5 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 33.6 Splatting 23.3 25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 355 360 358 362 362 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 445 Mixed 385 SusWrite 361 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 40.3 147% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 362 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 239GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 171 171 172 171 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 157 Mixed 90.9 SusWrite 170 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 115GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 105 105 105 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 106 Write 102 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 104 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA M393B5270DH0-CK0 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB M393B5270DH0-CK0 Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 M393B5270DH0-CK0 52GB 1867, 1600, 1867, 1600, 1600, 1867, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 16384, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	96.2% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 40.5 MC Mixed 35.4 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16