Asus K52Jc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemAsus K52Jc  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52Jc
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 96.8
48% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 131
19% 137 Pts
64-Core 132
9% 132 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1C22) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.33% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.33%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 18 52 87 73 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.9% Very poor
Read 158
Write 176
Mixed 152
SusWrite 83.2
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 10.5
26% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 53%
Toshiba MK3263GSX 320GB-$68
17GB free
Firmware: FG020A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 34 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.4
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 33
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 38%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
65GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 18.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 13.8
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
127% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 40%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
30GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 20.4
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Asint SSZ3128M8-EDJED 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical K52Jc Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Jc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $165
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback