Asus K52Jc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus K52Jc  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52Jc
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 67
2-Core 101
48% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 143
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1C22) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 18 52 87 73 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.9% Very poor
Read 158
Write 176
Mixed 152
SusWrite 83.2
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 10.5
26% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK3263GSX 320GB-$68
17GB free
Firmware: FG020A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 34 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.4
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 33
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 38%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
65GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 18.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 13.8
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
127% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
30GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 20.4
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asint SSZ3128M8-EDJED 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52Jc Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Jc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $162
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback