| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090406 |
| Uptime | 4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 08 '21 at 01:41 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.6%
Below average
|
40% 60.9 Pts
|
11% 79.8 Pts
|
5% 75.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
29% 39.8 fps
|
32% 40.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 69 82 57 44 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
30% 134 MB/s
|
65% 21 MB/s
|
9% 19.1 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
829GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 134 142 147 149 150 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
77% 107 MB/s
|
138% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.5%
Very poor
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
15% 5.37 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 55x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 14x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |