Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170725
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '21 at 00:23
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 121 59% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 216 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 2GB CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.3 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 21.4 13% 21.9 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 15.9 Splatting 0.1 10% 14 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 117 10 54 49 39 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 206 Write 98.3 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 55.5 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 13 52% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 51.2 DQ Write 71.9 DQ Mixed 76.5 54% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 557GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 155 152 156 157 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 164 Mixed 87.9 SusWrite 152 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.2% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	64x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	45x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	28x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	22x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $264

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16