Apple MacBookPro15,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-1E7E29AD0135F9BC
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 13:05
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 271
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 866
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Apple(106B 019A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.33
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 51.8
28% 48.4 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 56.2
40% 47.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 1332 1216 1339 1521 1359 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATS2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacBookPro15,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback