Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F222BEC8
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 60.4
36% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 63
8-Core 60.5
8% 61.8 Pts
64-Core 66.2
4% 66.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 320M
Apple(106B 00C2) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 306.37
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 5
Parallax 1.2
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GQ006B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 71 68 68 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43% Average
Read 81.1
Write 67.7
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 68.5
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 32GB
25GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.7 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Read 30.1
Write 10.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 9.1
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
83% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro7,1 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback