HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9480m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22DA
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 19:27
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NGA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 124
44% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 151
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 166
11% 166 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 63%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AV0A3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 71 84 82 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 65.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 76.4
47% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteBook Folio 9480m Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $385Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback