PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C24 |
Motherboard | MSI Z390M-S01 (MS-7C24) (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191230 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 06 '21 at 13:27 |
Run Duration | 1176 Seconds |
Run User | MNG-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 288 291 276 263 251 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
656GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 192 190 179 57 85 MB/s
|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
121GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 182 182 181 181 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown SED2666U1908 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 17x |
Core i9-9900KSIntelBench 99%, 12,840 samples | 12x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 23x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 9x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $695 |