Asus PRIME H310M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-E (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '21 at 08:51
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 77% 144 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 711 73% 587 Pts	64-Core 710 44% 710 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Gigabyte(1458 2553) 2GB CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 26.8 Reflection 35.1 Parallax 34.8 22% 32.2 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 24.3 21% 26 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI450000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 378 Write 156 Mixed 199 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 13.5 35% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.5 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 38.4 32% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 52%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 254GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 71.9 Write 81.6 Mixed 69 56% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.1 55% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 102 Write 98.9 Mixed 66.1 66% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 472GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 2,443 Write 9.2 876% 1,226 MB/s	4K Read 702 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.4 29,398% 235 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-E Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	221x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	200x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	93x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	67x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	66x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	22x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	21x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16