Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2991-A1
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120402
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '17 at 21:26
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 178 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 339 46% 342 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB CLim: 1021 MHz, MLim: 1301 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 7.85 Parallax 9.84 6% 8.15 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 8.17 Splatting 8.35 6% 7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.65% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 710 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 413 (B1) Unknown 97 97 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 53 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 27 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4575239600	44.6% Average	Read 253 Write 141 Mixed 144 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 11.2 71% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 11.1 38% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 182GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 141 3875 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1353 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8759 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1002 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 116 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1236 (C2) HDA temperature 103 98 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 95.8 Mixed 95 74% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.34 91% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 2x4GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E500 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	25x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	19x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	49x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	8x
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	17x
S700 500GBHP $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 Apacer 78.C1GET.AU10C M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 4 samples	4x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 48%, 5 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16