Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 30% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 53.4 1-Core 24.4 2-Core 23.4 26% 33.7 Pts	4-Core 22.7 8-Core 22.9 3% 22.8 Pts	64-Core 24.2 2% 24.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 39.9 Parallax 35.9 28% 36.7 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 27.1 27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 34 34 36 44 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 136 Write 56.2 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 34.4 16% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 5.8 31% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 39.6 DQ Mixed 12.4 15% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 2.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16