| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte B365M DS3H (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 05 '21 at 07:04 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
75% 133 Pts
|
49% 384 Pts
|
29% 463 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.2%
Poor
|
29% 36.5 fps
|
26% 33 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 352 384 390 393 377 MB/s
|
90.1%
Outstanding
|
87% 387 MB/s
|
123% 47.3 MB/s
|
105% 220 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
32.7%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
43% 92.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-B365M DS3H Builds (Compare 9,035 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $146
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,527x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,039x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 976x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 618x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 600x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 499x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $553 |