PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121009 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 05 '21 at 02:52 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 260 219 223 217 216 MB/s
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
5.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 202 207 203 204 MB/s
|
||||
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 120x |
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 35x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $520 |