Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '21 at 02:40
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 50.7 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 51.6 29% 42.7 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 200 18% 152 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 3976) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.3% Very good	Lighting 87.8 Reflection 106 Parallax 114 72% 103 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 97.2 Splatting 84.1 83% 104 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 295 304 306 306 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 433 Write 322 Mixed 306 SusWrite 294 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 24.2 82% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 199 148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 128%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$33 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 784GB free Firmware: GA06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 153 164 167 165 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 145 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 158 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB 19,774 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,849x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,478x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,386x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	510x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	498x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	355x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	221x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	275x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $787

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16