Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$80 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 74.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 295 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 566 8-Core 811 86% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,078 67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PwrHis(1787 D580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.2% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 90.4 54% 73.4 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 47.2 48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 894GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2061 1726 1719 1733 1739 1739 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,023 Write 2,330 Mixed 1873 SusWrite 1,786 452% 2,003 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 76.5 264% 98.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,235 DQ Write 1,080 DQ Mixed 1157 867% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 347%
SMI USB DISK 16GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 8.2 6.5 7.5 7.9 8 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 7.2 15% 12 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 2x8GB 2,365 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.2% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 29.8 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 31 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,621x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,227x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $80Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	854x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	820x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	700x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	622x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	304x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	374x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	203x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16