Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 166
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 577
56% 460 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 87.1
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 86.7
71% 86.1 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 77
Splatting 69.7
68% 85.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 300 308 313 310 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 431
Write 305
Mixed 225
SusWrite 304
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 13.6
82% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 86.7
104% 177 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
170GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 267 268 264 266 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 434
Mixed 317
SusWrite 272
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 38.9
130% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 249
209% 304 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 176 175 177 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 176
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 176
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2802 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 19.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 14.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback