Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '21 at 19:50
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 68.6 1-Core 155 2-Core 306 93% 177 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 945 92% 756 Pts	64-Core 1505 93% 1505 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 43 Parallax 39.6 31% 40.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 28.4 28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 500GB 1,201 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 997 1024 1043 974 855 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,013 Write 1,060 Mixed 945 SusWrite 966 225% 996 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 74.2 258% 96.8 MB/s	DQ Read 56 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 71.2 65% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 214%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB 8,393 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 929GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 335 286 290 288 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 458 Write 393 Mixed 314 SusWrite 314 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 15.5 75% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 47.9 DQ Mixed 15.2 17% 28 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 34,252 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.6% Good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 26.7 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 26.3 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,040x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	450x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	395x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	330x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	310x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	84x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	77x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $645

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16