Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190924
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '21 at 06:57
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X 3,902 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 62.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 78% 147 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 983 87% 739 Pts	64-Core 1,930 119% 1,930 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Gigabyte(1458 3FE9) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 226 Parallax 147 134% 179 fps	MRender 194 Gravity 157 Splatting 129 127% 160 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 767GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 477 477 479 478 478 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 478 Mixed 459 SusWrite 476 108% 478 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 48.4 158% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,553 Write 2,311 Mixed 1518 472% 2,128 MB/s	4K Read 64.2 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 84.4 283% 98.1 MB/s	DQ Read 937 DQ Write 747 DQ Mixed 843 630% 842 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 240GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 106 114 115 112 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 155 Write 151 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 109 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB 5,167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 51.9 MC Write 51.7 MC Mixed 49.8 146% 51.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 22.2 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	84x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	38x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	16x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16