Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 06:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 739
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 56.8
40% 53.3 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 51
45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1221 967 967 972 975 959 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2237
Write 1,655
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 1,010
354% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 68.2
224% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 1,037
790% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 269%
Great: 381%
Patriot Spark 2TB
539GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 89 88 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 88.3
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 96%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
44GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 29 28 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 14
Write 29.3
Mixed 8
SusWrite 28.3
14% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 122 130 123 129 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 75.9
Write 84.6
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 128
102% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 53%
Garmin Edge 5xx Flash 16GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.1 4.1 4 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 4
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 4
4% 3.22 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
93% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G240081 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.5
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback