Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J3710 2,453 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 36.7 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 52.1 23% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 94.6 14% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 99.2 6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 81BB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 3.6 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD easystore 240GB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: EF430400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 70 73 93 92 81 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.2% Below average	Read 281 Write 284 Mixed 137 SusWrite 92.7 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 9.8 42% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 48.4 DQ Write 64.7 DQ Mixed 15.9 23% 43 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 2,202 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.4% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 2.7 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J3710IntelBench 27%, 2,453 samples	25x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	25x

SSD
T253A3001T 1TBTeamBench 79%, 1,488 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	5x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16