Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T3610
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3610 (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190911
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 418 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.6% Above average	Lighting 76.6 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 73.3 62% 75 fps	MRender 60.9 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 50.4 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB 3,577 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFME1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 66 64 110 28 103 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 159 Write 98.5 Mixed 86 SusWrite 78.4 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 8.1 41% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 25.5 DQ Mixed 23 18% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 88%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2.5TB free Firmware: G009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 143 144 145 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 138 Write 137 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 144 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ81RF4BCFP-DJ-F M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ81RF4BCFD-DJ-F 32GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.6% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 27.6 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	942x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	560x
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples	246x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	236x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	51x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	167x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	142x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16