ADD TO PC
BUILD

ECT 4 OTTO ONE Office PC 130234

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	ECT 4 OTTO ONE Office PC 130234 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '21 at 23:14
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989 11,853 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 152 2-Core 263 95% 169 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 927 93% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,399 87% 1,399 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 7C08) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 9.2 6% 9.03 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 12.3 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB 5,875 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.2.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 344 237 125 146 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 484 Mixed 459 SusWrite 234 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 98.3 4K Mixed 49.1 179% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 250 179% 225 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 171 171 89 100 86 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 174 Write 162 Mixed 104 SusWrite 129 105% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 109%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 824GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 12 13 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 35.5 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 16.6 39% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1TB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 11 12 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 35.2 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 15.7 39% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.C8FE 2x16GB 627 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 22.4 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 24.3 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback