Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2415M 656 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 124 55% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 177 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Apple(106B 00DB) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 271 276 275 278 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 431 Write 401 Mixed 345 SusWrite 282 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 27.5 99% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 221 195% 294 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	161x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16