Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2930 2,000 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 57.4 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 26.9 26% 33 Pts	4-Core 34.6 8-Core 48.2 5% 41.4 Pts	64-Core 45.4 3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1854 0200) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH4-CE120 120GB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 59 60 43 11 37 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.1% Poor	Read 94.8 Write 84 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 42.2 16% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 13.8 27% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 51.3 DQ Mixed 50.2 50% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB 3,854 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.2 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16