Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 56.6 1-Core 67 2-Core 110 46% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 108 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8324) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.1.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 5.6 3% 5 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 5.9 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GB 2,721 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 181 179 191 193 196 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 413 Write 318 Mixed 291 SusWrite 188 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 27.2 98% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 173 138% 194 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-4 HP24D4S7S8MBP-8 12GB 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.9% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	33x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	14x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	11x

SSD
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	2x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	13x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	5x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16